Elgin Energy has submitted plans for a 38MW solar farm across 191 acres east of Low Maidendale Farm at Hurworth Moor, about a mile south east of Darlington. As Place North East reported, it would generate enough electricity for around 16,400 homes a year. The reference is 25/01330/FUL on Darlington Council’s portal.
The timing is not accidental
A fortnight ago we covered the Planning Inspectorate allowing an appeal for a 155-acre solar and battery scheme at Hare Hill Farm in County Durham, after the council refused it. The inspector accepted the development caused moderate landscape harm and judged that renewable energy benefits outweighed it.
We said at the time that decision would be cited, and that it told developers the odds at appeal were good. Here is a 191-acre scheme in the next authority along, at almost exactly the same scale, roughly a fortnight later.
Applications of this size take many months to prepare, so this was not written in response to Hare Hill. But the pipeline is clearly there, and the appeal decision tells everyone in it what happens if a council says no.
The detail that answers the usual objection
Two things in this application address the standard criticisms directly.
First, the consent period is 40 years, after which the infrastructure is removed and the site restored. Solar farms are frequently described as permanent industrialisation of countryside. They are not. The panels come out and the field goes back, which is more than can be said for a housing estate or a distribution shed on the same land.
Second, the land is described as moderate quality arable. The strongest argument against large solar is the loss of high grade agricultural land and national food security. That argument is considerably weaker on moderate quality ground, and the honest position is that some sites deserve refusal on those grounds and others do not.
What is missing
The published detail does not mention battery storage, which the Hare Hill scheme included and which generates most of the local anxiety about noise and fire risk. Nor does it set out a community benefit arrangement.
That second omission is worth pressing on. A scheme occupying 191 acres for four decades, generating revenue throughout, sits in a specific parish whose residents look at it every day. Community benefit funds are standard practice in onshore wind and increasingly common in solar. If one is not offered here, it is a fair thing for Hurworth residents to ask about.
The bigger picture for the North East
Darlington is already carrying significant development pressure, with Burtree Garden Village to the north and the Tees Valley brownfield programme running alongside. Adding 191 acres of solar to the south is another claim on land around one town.
There is no version of the energy transition that does not use land, and pretending otherwise helps nobody. What the North East does not yet have is a clear regional view of where this generation should go, so it lands application by application, each one fought locally, with the Planning Inspectorate quietly setting the policy through appeals. That is a poor way to make a decision this large.
The North is FU7URE’s briefing on the people, capital and infrastructure reshaping the North of England. Subscribe to the free newsletter to get it in your inbox.
Leave a Reply